The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to weigh in on a major Second Amendment question:
Can the government ban an entire class of people from owning firearms simply because they use marijuana?
In this episode, CRPA President Chuck Michel joins us to break down US v. Harris, a case challenging federal law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) — the ban on firearm ownership for marijuana users — and how it ties into CRPA’s ongoing national efforts to protect constitutional rights.
Chuck explains how the Harris case differs from US v. Himani, why bad facts make bad law, and how these cases could reshape how the federal government defines “prohibited persons.”