The Duncan v. Bonta reply brief has been filed — and this could be the final push that gets California’s magazine ban in front of the Supreme Court.
Today we break down what the reply brief says, why it directly challenges the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and why this case may be the strongest vehicle yet for SCOTUS to finally clarify what counts as “protected arms” under the Second Amendment.
We also cover how millions of Californians could become criminals overnight if the mandate issues — and why the “takings clause” argument is now more important than ever.